|Dozierende||Selen Etingü Breslaw (firstname.lastname@example.org, BeurteilerIn)|
|Inhalt||This workshop held by Prof. Ahmet Kuyas (Galatasaray University, Istanbul & Bosphorus University, Istanbul) and Dr. M. Asim Karaomerlioglu (Bosphorus University, Istanbul), intends to shed light on specific historiographical questions emerging from the interactions of political developments, demographic realities and social mobilization in Turkey from the Unionist through the Kemalist era (1908-1945). By examining such interactions, we aim to reassess and rethink some of the dominant viewpoints and paradigms relating to the general contours of Turkish history.
The workshop will consist of four sessions:
1. Social Dynamics during the Unionist Era
From the return to constitutional rule in 1908 to the foundation of the Republic, Turkey went through catastrophic and colossal diplomatic, social and political developments. Despite the existence of many social dynamics, particularly with regards to the population politics of the Unionists and massive social mobilization, the political history of the era was almost exclusively elaborated on the basis of intellectual currents, political affiliations and elite achievements. Problematizing the concept of “social generations,” we aim to portray the social background of the Young Turk generation, their obsession with population politics and their top-down attempt in mobilizing the Muslims while indeed challenged by the bottom-up social mobilization of local populations, as evidenced by the so-called “Boycott movements.” Likewise, by using the Unionists’ social mobilization of elites and masses in matters of family, fertility, marriage and women, we attempt to problematize the dominant historiographical approaches based on one-sided, top-down elite undertakings in the face of the existence of the from-below social dynamics. Our aim is to reassess the role of elites and social dynamics in the making of the new Republic.
2. Revolution and Counter-Revolution (1908-1922)
Starting with the very first day of the Second Constitutional Period, a multi-faceted power struggle began between two groups. These groups can be best described, on the one hand, as radical constitutionalists, that is, partisans of the sovereignty of the Parliament, and on the other, the conservatives who consisted of a mixture of anti-constitutionalists and moderates. The latter preferred a German type of constitutionalism in which the sultan would possess significant constitutional prerogatives. The new electoral process and the subsequent constitutional amendments had been the first grounds of contention, and the constitutional amendments were the very issue on the occasion of which the counter-revolutionary March 31st Event occurred in 1909. We believe that it is through developments such as the latter, the gradual transformation of the Liberal Entente Party into a reactionary group, and the military rising of 1912 that the Unionist opted for the dictatorship which was established in June 1913. We are also of the opinion that the struggle between the nationalist resistance fighters in Anatolia and Sultan Mehmed VI Vahdettin during the period after the Armistice of Mudros is none other than a continuation of this dialectical process eventually ending with the abolition of the sultanate.
3. How the Social Affects the Political? Population and Political Mobilization in Kemalist Turkey
The formation of the Kemalist regime in Turkey was not simply a consequence of elite projections, historical contingency and day-to-day politics. Underlying all of these were indeed a demographic earthquake Turkey faced after the eleven years war period. In this sense, the social fabric of the country changed as the ethnic, urban and social composition of the population changed. It was in this context that the new regime was involved in pro-natalist policies to increase the quantity of the population while ideologically the peasants were declared as the master of the nation and a staunch Turkification policy were introduced. These challenging goals required a political mobilization to be successful, yet new propaganda sources and institutions such as the People’s Houses were insufficient to carry out these sometimes daunting and certainly difficult goals. This insufficiency coupled with the necessity to accomplish so many things in a short period of time determined the Kemalist regime’s evolutionary trajectory.
4. The Rise and the Waning of Kemalist Jacobinism, 1923-1939
The Kemalists have to be considered as the majority faction that emerged from the split which occurred within the radical constitutionalist circles in response to the absolutist bid of Mehmed VI Vahdettin. The developments such as the proclamation of the Republic or the abolition of the Caliphate deepened this rift. It is hard to imagine what form would the Kemalist reforms would have taken had the Sheikh Said Rebellion not happened and not provided the regime with the opportunity to suppress the equally nationalistic opposition. The ensuing single-party period, we argue, was actually established in 1927. We therefore accept the Free Party episode as significant only in so far as it constituted a warning, a statement by the electorate, which meant that the unprecedented political legitimacy conferred upon the regime by the victory in 1922 could not go on forever. It is a well known fact that the regime was not able to produce wealth for its constituency in the 1930s either and that it indulged in producing nationalistic mythology as a palliative measure. The clouds of war gathering on top of Europe in the mid-1930s, we believe, have been a life saver for this stagnant Turkey. The negative Soviet response to the Straits Convention of 1936 was balanced by Ernest Jackh’s unofficial visit to Ankara the same year and the subsequent Anglo-Turkish loan contract for the construction of the Karabük steel industries. The pro-fascist Minister of the Interior Recep Peker was ousted from office the same year, followed by the dismissal of the staunchly neutral Premier İsmet İnönü, the year after. A proponent of market economy, Celal Bayar, then occupied the office of prime minister, while the process through which Alexandretta was to become Turkish had commenced. Turkey, once more, had started to look “westwards.”
|Literatur||Participants will receive a list of required readings from the guest lecturers by August 10, 2017.|
|Bemerkungen||This workshop by Prof. Ahmet Kuyas (Galatasaray University, Istanbul & Bosphorus University, Istanbul) and Dr. M. Asim Karaomerlioglu (Bosphorus University, Istanbul) will be in English.
Dates and Locations:
This is a two-day intensive seminar (from October 27, 12:30 pm to October 28, 12:30 pm, 2017).
The workshop sessions on Friday, October 27 will take place at Kollegienhaus, Mehrzweckraum 035.
The workshop sessions on Saturday, October 28 will take place at Maiengasse, Seminarraum E005.
|Teilnahmebedingungen||PhD students who wish to attend the workshop are asked to write an email to Dr. Selen Etingü (email@example.com), with a biographical abstract explaining their research interests and projects as well as their academic background (max. 400 words, in 3rd person singular, in English). The deadline for the application is August 1, 2017. Applicants will receive an answer regarding their participation on August 10.|
|Anmeldung zur Lehrveranstaltung||PhD students who wish to attend the workshop are asked to write an email to Dr. Selen Etingü (firstname.lastname@example.org), with a biographical abstract explaining their research interests and projects as well as their academic background (max. 400 words, in 3rd person singular, in English). The deadline for the application is August 1, 2017. Applicants will receive an answer regarding their participation on August 10.|
|Einsatz digitaler Medien||kein spezifischer Einsatz|
|Datum||27.10.2017 – 28.10.2017|
Freitag, 08.00-19.00 Kollegienhaus, Mehrzweckraum 035
|Freitag 27.10.2017||08.00-19.00 Uhr||Kollegienhaus, Mehrzweckraum 035|
|Samstag 28.10.2017||08.00-16.00 Uhr||Maiengasse, Seminarraum 0105|
Doktorat Near & Middle Eastern Studies: Empfehlungen (Promotionsfach Near & Middle Eastern Studies)
Modul Politik und Geschichte der Region (Neuzeit und Gegenwart) (Master Studienfach Near & Middle Eastern Studies)
|Hinweise zur Leistungsüberprüfung||Participants are entitled to 2 ECTS points for successful participation. Participants will receive a list of required readings from the guest lecturers by August 10, 2017. Successful participation at the workshop is subject to the mandatory completion of the required readings in advance and active participation in the workshop discussions.|
|An-/Abmeldung zur Leistungsüberprüfung||Anmelden: Belegen; Abmelden: nicht erforderlich|
|Skala||Pass / Fail|
|Wiederholtes Belegen||keine Wiederholung|
|Zuständige Fakultät||Philosophisch-Historische Fakultät, email@example.com|
|Anbietende Organisationseinheit||Fachbereich Nahost-Studien|